Resolving this issue remains challenging in addiction, but once again, this is not different from other areas of medicine [see e.g., [12] for type 2 diabetes]. Longitudinal studies that track patient trajectories over time may have a better ability to identify subpopulations than cross-sectional assessments [13]. The revitalized, cross-disciplinary BPSM proposed here can be used to theorize personal and institutional factors relevant to clinical care and highlight their role as critical and not merely discretionary considerations.

biopsychosocial model of addiction

Interpretations, Language, and Causality

biopsychosocial model of addiction

(Ghaemi (2010) has previously noted the BPSM’s tendency towards eclecticism and insufficiently systematized data collection). First, the authors claim that the BPSM was used to “identify” TMD as a “complex disorder,” when the BPSM was actually used to define it as such. Second, the authors claim that the OPPERA findings support the proposition that TMD is a “complex disorder.” However, as discussed, this argument only works if we read the proposition into the empirical findings. Third, the authors argue that the apparent resonance between the OPPERA findings and the biopsychosocial approach to jaw pain “confirm[s]” that TMDs have a non-local etiology. It is important to note that what is at stake here is not just our usage of the term “disease” per se. It implies that the cause of the problem is more or less known and that it is organic in nature.

Understanding the Impact of Close Relationships

The informants expressed strong emotions when talking about the close relationships in their lives. They either spoke about their parents as ‘betrayers’ and ‘bastards’ or as loving and supportive people. Siblings, grandparents, aunts, and uncles often represented stability and safety in families with parental SUD or mental health problems. The feeling of safety was closely related to violent relationships, housing, the neighbourhood or finances.

  • The feeling of safety was closely related to violent relationships, housing, the neighbourhood or finances.
  • From a conceptual standpoint, however, a chronic relapsing course is neither necessary nor implied in a view that addiction is a brain disease.
  • It wasn’t until the middle of the 20th century before the impact of social learning on our behavior was fully recognized.
  • Our overarching concern is that questionable arguments against the notion of addiction as a brain disease may harm patients, by impeding access to care, and slowing development of novel treatments.

The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine.

Furthermore, efficacy of treatment approaches such as contingency management, which provides systematic incentives for abstinence [107], supports the notion that behavioral choices in patients with addictions remain sensitive to reward contingencies. The biopsychosocial model of addiction (Figure 1) posits that intersecting biological, psycho-social and systemic properties are fundamental features of health and illness. The model includes the way in which macro factors inform and shape micro systems and brings biological, psychological and social levels into active interaction with one another. It is a model based on Engel’s original biopsychosocial model (Engel 1977) for which he argued that to develop a scientific and comprehensive description of mental health, theories that promote biological reductionism should be dismissed in favour of those that adhere to general systems theory. The contemporary model, adapted for addiction, reflects an interactive dynamic for understanding substance use problems specifically and addressing the complexity of addiction-related issues. The empirical foundation of this model is thus interdisciplinary, and both descriptive and applied.

  • The reinforcing and euphoric properties of opiates arise from increased amounts of extracellular dopamine in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens.
  • A recent major work on the BPSM described the model as having “become the orthodox overarching model for health, disease and healthcare” (Bolton and Gillett 2019, 5).
  • 16In some cases (e.g., TMD, chronic pain, and violence, discussed below), wayward discourse has played a leading role in the reification of illness constructs as diseases.
  • McLaren, Ghaemi, and others have argued that the BPSM is vague and/or devoid of meaningful scientific content (Bolton and Gillett 2019; Ghaemi 2009; McLaren 1998; Van Oudenhove and Cuypers 2014; Weiner 2008).
  • It is important to allow them the journey of peer support, mutual aid, culture, nature, and spirituality to find their own spiritual dimension and it’s important to them.
  • So, should researchers aggregate disparate presentations to capture the fundamental “complexity” of TMD or disaggregate them to produce groupings that are more scientifically and clinically meaningful (i.e., valid in the normal sense of the term)?
  • Since the beginning of a definable drug culture, that culture has had an effect on mainstream cultural institutions, particularly through music, art, and literature.

Yet Ohrbach and Dworkin (2016) seem unsure of what to make of comorbidity and heterogeneity in the case of TMD. At times they appear to argue that the diverse problems manifested by patients (“abundant variables,” “appreciable variability”) mean that the TMD construct17 is good. These findings are said to show that the TMD construct is “accurate” and “a sufficient marker for underlying complexity”—i.e., the “complexity” ascribed to TMD as a “complex disease.” Elsewhere, however, the authors appear to adopt the more typical position on heterogeneity and comorbidity. They suggest that the variability observed among patients Top 5 Advantages of Staying in a Sober Living House means that the TMD construct should be modified in some way (perhaps decomposed into more homogenous sub-diagnoses) to allow for more “refined assessment” of patient subgroups (Ohrbach and Dworkin 2016, 1096–97). So, should researchers aggregate disparate presentations to capture the fundamental “complexity” of TMD or disaggregate them to produce groupings that are more scientifically and clinically meaningful (i.e., valid in the normal sense of the term)? Notably, BPSM-based studies often describe their objects of study specifically as illness, illness behaviors, the experience of disease, disability, and so on.

  • However, when physically dependent and in a state of withdrawal, their choice preference would reverse [102].
  • The importance of the drug culture to the person using drugs often increases with time as the person’s association with it deepens (Moshier et al. 2012).
  • Addressing these critiques requires a very different perspective, and is the objective of our paper.

Whole Person Healthcare The Biopsychosocial Spiritual Model of Medicine. By Doodle Med.(

Leave your vote

By syirajt

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.